-
Brighton & Hove City Council faces legal and ethical questions regarding compliance with the updated Equality and Human Rights Commission Code, effective August 5, 2026. Council exchanges show personal distress amid confusion over affirming transgender rights while adhering to existing laws. Clarity on implementation plans and consultation with all affected groups is urgently needed.
-
A public exchange at Brighton & Hove City Council highlighted significant concerns about safeguarding practices related to autism and gender-related distress. Kate Sawyer’s query about changes prompted by local failures revealed that the Council failed to identify any adjustments after parent concerns. The lack of accountability raises questions about the safeguarding culture and responsiveness of…
-
More than a hundred residents of Brighton & Hove raised concerns regarding the Council’s safeguarding practices and educational policies related to gender-related issues, seeking clarity on six key questions. The Chief Executive’s response was seen as insufficient, highlighting the need for a comprehensive review of the Council’s governance, curriculum, and handling of parental concerns.
-
PSHE Brighton has urged educational leaders to review safeguarding policies ahead of the new statutory guidance effective September 2026. The emphasis is on ensuring children’s welfare, engaging parents, and understanding the importance of the terms “must” and “should.” The guidance highlights that safeguarding is a shared responsibility and advocates for careful consideration regarding social transition…
-
Ahead of the Goldsmid ward by-election, PSHEbrighton sought candidates’ views on safeguarding concerns, particularly following an NHS investigation into WellBN. Only Luke Willmoth responded, highlighting wider silence from public officials on pressing safeguarding questions. PSHEbrighton emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability in addressing long-standing parental concerns in Brighton & Hove.
-
The NHS Sussex investigation into gender-related hormone treatment at WellBN in Brighton revealed significant care failings, affecting 78 children. Many prescriptions lacked necessary consultations and monitoring. Questions of safeguarding were disregarded, highlighting the need for thorough examination of concerns before dismissing them as baseless. Institutional scrutiny is essential for child safety.
-
Recent developments, including the Cass Review, the Supreme Court’s judgment in For Women Scotland, updated Equality and Human Rights Commission guidance and changes to national safeguarding expectations, mean many schools are reviewing policies relating to sex, privacy, safeguarding and parental involvement.
-
The draft Equality Act 2010 Code of Practice clarifies that “sex” refers to biological sex and legitimizes single-sex provisions in schools, emphasizing safeguarding. School governors must ensure policies are legally compliant, document decisions, and prioritize privacy and safety. The shift from ambiguity to accountability requires thorough risk assessments and justifiable practices.
-
With new statutory guidance on Relationships, Sex and Health Education set for September 2026, schools face compliance risks due to policy language from providers like The Key. The guidance emphasizes legal clarity and requires governance bodies to adopt evidence-based teaching, ensuring safeguarding and accurate representation of contested concepts.
-
Today, PSHE Brighton has formally issued an Open Letter to school governors across Brighton & Hove, accompanied by a Governor Safeguarding Briefing: Schools, Sex, and Safeguarding — What Governors Need to Know (2026). These documents have been circulated via Clerks to Governing Bodies, with a clear purpose: to support governors in discharging their statutory safeguarding…